LAWS ARE PRECISE IN BEING INCONCLUSIVE LOL (RANT)

It’s about time I rant about this topic. Well, first off, how could I not pick on this topic when it is way to easy.  I’ll have to try and focus on one specific area at a time (something that laws have difficulty doing)!

What a field day I can have on this topic. **I’M NOT A LAW STUDENT, LAWYER, OR HAVE ANY OTHER TYPE OF LEGAL BACKROUND** SO DON’T PANIC! I WIL NOT BE USING THIER LEGAL LANGUAGE! WE, STILL HAVE DIFFICULTIES WITH THE WORDS WE USE ON THE DAY THE DAY LOL                                                                                                                          LAUGH NOW BEFORE THIS GOES IN LEGAL LITERACY 101- CHAPTER 1 IS TITLED “THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING” (THEY EVEN INCLUDE PIG LATIN- I MEAN LATIN) JUST TO THROW YOU OFF LOL WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH THAT?

DOES THE LATIN LANUAGE REMAIN DUE TO LAZINESS, OR FROM BEING PREOCCUPIED  (REVISING, CREATING,  AMENDING ALL THE OTHER LAWS)? OR, IS IT THERE JUST TO PISS PEOPLE OFF? MAYBE, ITS PART OF AN OVERALL DESIGN WHICH MAKES PEOPLE FEEL THE NEED TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, AND ENTER INTO PROCEEDINGS, TRIALS, MOTIONS, APPEALS, PLEADINGS, JUSTICE, AND BE AWARDED COMPENSATION FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING IN WHICH YOU NEED TO SHARE WITH YOUR ATTORNEY, LOL

EVEN IF LATIN WAS NOT INVOLVED THEY USE A LANGUAGE THAT CONSISTS OF WORDS WE GENERALLY WOULD NEVER USE. EVER! 

THEY HAD A GOOD RUN UNTIL THE INTERNET POPPED UP. IT IS NOW POSSIBLE FOR THE CLIENT TO RESEARCH INFORMATION WITHOUT REQUIRING THAT MUCH EFFORT.

THERE WAS WIDESPREAD LEGAL PANIC LASTING AT LEAST 2 OR 3 MINUTES UNTIL THEIR EDUCATED MIND SAID “THESE ARE PEOPLE, YOU COULD POST THE INFORMATION ON THEIR FRONT LAWN AND THEY WOULDN’T GIVE IT ANY ATTENTION, SO STOP PANICKING” !    LOL

We might as well start with general understandings and interpretation of law. Already, without going forward I can start ranting on my opening statement.  Interpretation and understanding of laws is so comedic and irrational that they have a “built in safety clause” This is to apply when I Law is considered to be vague, and not clearly understandable by any “reasonable person” lol

I can’t help but laugh as I’m writing this. How could you reasonably identify a reasonable person, from someone who is not reasonable? Especially when a reasonable (sensible) person would possibly have a more difficult time understanding the laws because already presented with conflict that an unreasonable person is one who would break the law by action made through a mind without reasoning capabilities. That would mean that an unreasonable person could not violated a law but not have understood the law, which would make them free from guilt..

A person who is reasonable that will challenge a law or possibly break a law with a logical and valid REASON will be guilty because they knowingly defied the law of record.

There is a lot more to this, you didn’t expect it to be simple, did you? Just writing what I just wrote I’m suffering a mental meltdown. I’ll stop here for now. Think the new defense will be not the glove doesn’t fit, it will be I don’t get it. Oh one last thing consider. There are a few laws that referred to the public morals. Naturally people have different morals, which would cause question to what would violate A person morals considering everybody has different ones. Just you know the law says that the public morals is decided by the government of what they consider to be moral and apply that to the public. Ha ha we won’t even get into that, but if you didn’t know what was considered to be the public morals, then you could legally violated because you didn’t know lol

I’m going to make this post without reviewing it. My brain hurts enough just from writing it. I’ll review it some other time

REAL ESTATE TAXES—-

OUR REAL ESTATE TAXES- 

     This real estate tax thing is just another random thought that I might as well share….

     There are approximately 18k houses in my town with an average real estate tax of $10k per year. That is $180million per year!

     As far as I know the majority of this goes to the schools,(50%) I think….  and the rest is for maintenance of roads, parks, local government and police payroll, and whatever else……..

     So if we take out 1/2 for schools $90million *don’t forget the schools also receive funding from other sources on top of that,yet (We still underpay our teachers) but thats another topic….

     Now there is $90million left for them to spread around…… I’ll have to come back to this because I dont feel like crunching #’s right now. lol I’m sure it won’t add up without “left overs” that they find someway to use use it  ——– responsibly lol

NEW YEARS RESOLUTIONS (Thought)

Many of the new year resolutions people set are for personal change. Anytime someone does something to improve themselves or their quality of life is an admirable trait that hopefully is done more regularly than on a annual basis.

WHERE AM I GOING WITH THIS????????

HOW ABOUT WE SET A NEW YEARS RESOLUTION THAT INCLUDES ANOTHER PERSON THAT COULD BENEFIT FROM IT?

We look out for ourselves and/or family first (hopefully) all year long….. I’m saying that maybe a new year resolution should be something that applies to benefit another person or cause. Use your imagination of the potential outcome this action could have. It might not be so easy to give up knowing that somebody else is involved with the outcome of your action. If you make some change that helps somebody else think how rewarding that could be! Now apply that to your community, neighbor, friend, or if everybody did that as their resolution!

DON’T GET DISTRACTED OR OVERWHELMED BY THE BIG PICTURE! JUST FOCUS ON APPLYING IT TO 1 OTHER BESIDES YOURSELF.

Success on the New Year’s resolution will not only be more attainable it also be collectively supported.

Just a random idea.