Psychological Difference NOT Disability

When we talk about psychological disabilities I have a problem with that terminology. I like to refer to it as a psychological difference rather then a disability. The term disability implies that the person has a dysfunction or limitation in functioning. Whether you agree or not I think some of the greatest minds in history would’ve been labeled as having a psychological disability simply because their minds function differently than the majority. When someone says that I am crazy or my thoughts are not normal, I think that is a complement. This is because I have come to realize that the norm of thought is not a active process it all. The majority of people that is considered normal are semi-conscious simple-minded individuals that have little if any original thought processes. They usually function on preprogrammed subconscious behavior patterns and suffer from cognitive dissonance.

Regardless if the person who has a psychological difference may have a disability, that it is fair say that a normal person has a lack of ability.

 

Advertisements

SINCE WE HAVE OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY COMING

Since our Independence Day is coming up and we celebrate. There are a few things I would like you to consider. Most of which was probably not taught to you in school, or at least fully explained so that you have a understanding of what is involved in our independence. Which, call me crazy I feel is important if you going to celebrate something that you probably do not know.

I’m not a radical person or into politics, and even I just became aware of this information recently that I found to be very interesting. More importantly however interesting it is I found it’s important for people to understand and realize the significance of it. For me personally after reading and understanding it, I have a different view on things.

In general, I have a different view when people complain about certain things, particularly their current leadership and government. Like I said I do not get involved in politics but researching it is interesting. This brings me to our celebration on July 4 Independence Day, that most people who celebrate it I am sure have some grievances complaints are unhappy with “certain things”…….. But they will celebrate their independence while being non-independent….

Anyway, some interesting reading for the upcoming celebration of our independence day, and a reminder of what it stands for and means.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

    ****OBVIOUSLY THERE IS MORE TO IT, BUT I DIDN’T WANT TO MAKE IT A LONG READ…. IF YOU WANT TO READ THE WHOLE DOCUMENT THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF RESOURCES BUT    HERE IS ONE LINK

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html

“SAVE YOUR MONEY FOR A RAINY DAY” HAHA

SAVE YOUR MONEY FOR A RAINY DAY…… WHERE IS THE LOGIC BEHIND THAT?????

IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY WHY DON’T YOU JUST BUY AN UMBRELLA?

THEN YOU DON’T NEED TO SAVE YOUR MONEY FOR A RAINY DAY AND YOU CAN USE THE REST OF YOUR MONEY TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING WITH IT………. MAYBE ACTUALLY MAKE MORE MONEY! LOL

SAYING : “YOU’RE FIGHTING FOR A LOST CAUSE” (ANALYZED)

We have all heard the saying “FIGHTING FOR A LOST CAUSE”. But, do you ever think about what that means? Have you ever had someone say that to you?

WHERE DO I BEGIN WITH THIS ONE? 

Maybe it’s considered a lost cause because your the only one fighting for it. Could it be that everyone else has given up and expects nothing to change?

WELL, THOSE WHO FIGHT FOR A “LOST CAUSE” ARE THE ONES THAT CHANGE HISTORY!

Just because you are alone, or not supported in your fight does not mean it is a lost cause. You might actually be fighting to get back something that has been lost and believed to be unattainable. If it wasn’t lost, you wouldn’t need to be fighting for it.

SO, THOSE WHO SAY “YOU ARE FIGHTING FOR A LOST CAUSE” NEED TO REALIZE THAT THE PERSON IS FIGHTING FOR WHAT YOU FEEL HAS BEEN LOST!

RANDOM PRESIDENTIAL QUOTES

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Benjamin Franklin

“Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.”
Abraham Lincoln

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds”           Samuel Adams

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”
Thomas Jefferson

IS THE LAWYER OR THE LAW SCHOOL RESPONSIBLE ?

THIS IS NOT REFERRING TO ANY SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTER

Attorneys have devoted a significant amount of time and money to obtain their law degree. Usually a Doctor of Jurisprudence or Juris Doctor. Whatever the degree/title or “State BAR” requirements are to “practice” law are, I have a question. ———-

WHEN A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE REJECTS THE LAW BECAUSE IT CHALLENGES THE “NORMAL SYSTEM OF CONSISTENT CONFORMITY”, IS THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM GUILTY AS WELL AS THE INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY?

This is a complicated subject, but is one that is important. There is no doubt in my mind that there are great attorneys out there, and regardless of great resistance and being ostracized they still challenge certain issues that majority would/could not. The numbers show that it is “SYSTEMATIC” NOT TO GO TO COURT!!!!!

IF YOU ARE GUILTY, A PLEA IS A GOOD DEAL!…… IF YOU ARE INNOCENT, THE “SYSTEM” MAKES IT PUNISHABLE TO PROVE IT IN COURT.

WELL THIS IS INTERESTING 

In the fiscal year of 2010-2011 (July 2010 to June 2011), the trial courts (circuit and county) in Florida disposed of 2,774,302 civil cases (not including probate, family court, or civil traffic infraction cases). Of that, only 1,049 were disposed by a jury and only 4,348 were disposed through a non-jury or bench trial. So out of all the cases disposed during the 2010-2011 fiscal year, less than 0.2% made it to trial. As for settling prior to trial, just looking at Circuit Civil alone (not including probate, family court, or civil traffic infraction cases), 9.9% of cases settle prior to other disposition and 1.2% settle through mediation. So nearly 90% of all civil cases in the state circuit courts (not including probate, family court, or civil traffic infraction cases) fail to settle or make it to trial.

I’m not a attorney, I have no “formal” legal education. That being said, I find it unacceptable if I speak with an attorney or other legal official that do not know the legal statute/code/law/amendment/terminology….. ect…. BUT STILL CLAIM TO KNOW IT AND/OR APPLY IT WRONGFULLY -THEY SHOULD JUST ADMIT WHEN THEY NEED TO RESEARCH IT OR DOUBLE CHECK IT——–

THERE IS SO MUCH COMPLEXITY BEYOND THE JUST THE “BASIC” THAT I WOULD UNDERSTAND THEM NEEDING TO CHECK!!!!!!!

IT DOESN’T MAKE THEM INCOMPETENT WHEN THEY ARE NOT SURE ABOUT SOMETHING, BUT, NEGLIGENT IF THEY PROCEED REGARDLESS

LIKE MEDICAL DOCTORS 

WE TRUST THESE PROFESSIONALS WITH OUR LIFE!!!!!

ASK QUESTIONS, GET 2ND OPINIONS 

SOME GREY AREAS (BRAIN)

Without going into the extensive details of the neurological system and design, I just want to bring to attention a new way of thinking (no pun intended) when people refer to the term “Its either black or white” —– No No No!!

There are a lot of “GREY AREAS” Considering that Grey matter contains most of the brain’s neuronal cell bodies like regions of the brain involved in muscle control, and sensory perception such as seeing and hearing, memory, emotions, speech, decision making, and self-control.

SO—— THERE MIGHT BE SOME IMPORTANT GREY AREAS LOL

YEA, YOU HAVE TO LAUGH LOL

YOU HAVE TO LAUGH AT THE COMEDIC SHOW THEY OFFER, BUT, AT SOME POINT REALIZE THE JOKES ARE AT YOUR EXPENSE. IT’S FUNNY, I’M SORRY LOL THE STUPIDITY THEY SHOW AND OPENLY ADMIT TO MAKES IT EVEN MORE HILARIOUS THAT THEY THINK PEOPLE ARE SO CLUELESS AND NO THREAT OF AWARENESS TO WHAT THEY DON’T EVEN HIDE…..

THIS ISN’T A POLITICAL POST, IT’S JUST SOMETHING YOU WON’T SEE ON THE EVENING NEWS AND I WANTED TO SHARE LOL

(I KNOW IT’S A LONG VIDEO BUT THE FIRST 15 MINUTES IS ENOUGH) YOU’LL POSSIBLY GET HOOKED INTO WATCHING THE WHOLE VIDEO —- ENJOY

ARE YOU INTERPRETING RESPONSIBLY?

FIRST A LITTLE BORING SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND

Music and emotion
Music is capable of producing some of the strongest emotional reactions in humans, whether it’s joy, sadness, fear or nostalgia. It’s interesting to note than people from a diverse range of cultures and backgrounds will often agree on whether a piece of music sounds happy or sad – for this reason music is often considered the universal “language of emotions”.
The idea of music as language is more accurate than it might first seem. When we hear music, our brains are imposing structure and order on a number of distinct sounds so that we experience them as a whole. It’s a perceptual illusion that changes what we hear, much as we don’t “hear” spoken language as a series of vocalisations – instead, we hear the meaning of the words.
However, music is much more rooted in primitive brain structures than language – structures connected with motivation, reward and primal emotions. For instance, that urge to get your shake on on the dance floor is caused by neural oscillators synchronising with the pulse of the music,
causing us to unconsciously anticipate when the next beat will occur. When the beat falls, our brains give us a small ‘reward’ hit for anticipating it correctly.
There’s no strong scientific agreement on why music has such a powerful ability to conjure up the same images and feelings, even among different people with different memories. The appreciation of music involves a complex combination of the brain’s memory, language, auditory and emotional centres all working together – perhaps it’s simply this satisfying, harmonious brain-exercise that gives us the pleasure response.

TAKE A LOOK/LISTEN TO THESE EDIT VERSIONS OF MOVIES TRAILERS AND HOW DIFFERENT THEY ARE INTERPRETED …. !!!! KEEP THAT IN MIND WHEN YOU WATCH THE “NEWS” OR ANYTHING YOU READ, HEAR, SEE ….

COMMON SENSE AWARENESS

DO YOU KNOW WHAT COMMON SENSE IS? OR, MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT IT IS NOT!

     Are you aware that common sense is not a valid reference or even a reliable source to support to itself? This will definitely be confusing and difficult to comprehend even if I was able to describe it well.

     Maybe it is a good thing that this described in a way without proper writing techniques….. Something like this is hard enough to understand to begin with, without me making it worse by trying to write properly.

     So I’m just gonna write it how I think it. Your common sense is only what you have commonly accepted to be accurate, and excepted as true in the past. In no way is that permanent, or expected to be a permanent. It is only temporary beliefs formed by past experiences that have supported it. When new information is presented that may challenge these “common sense” beliefs, they should always be considered as a possible replacement for the old common sense!

     FOR EXAMPLE- THIS WAS SOMETHING I HAVE JUST RECENTLY EXPERIENCED…….

          —-MY ENTIRE LIFE I WAS UNDER THE BELIEF THAT COAL COULD BE TURNED INTO A DIAMOND UNDER PRESSURE AND TIME ——- IT WAS COMMON SENSE TO ME THAT COAL COULD BE TRANSFORMED INTO A DIAMOND!!!!! THERE WERE JOKES REFERENCING THIS (STICK COAL UP HIS *** AND IT WILL TURN INTO A DIAMOND!)

     I’M PRETTY SURE THAT EVEN SUPERMAN HAD SOME CONTRIBUTION TO THIS “COAL INTO DIAMOND”

     WELL, MY COMMON SENSE THAT COAL CAN PRODUCE A DIAMOND HAS JUST RECENTLY BECAME AWARE TO ME AS 100% FALSE!!!! IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR COAL TO PRODUCE A DIAMOND! EVER! —- WITHOUT GOING INTO MOLECULAR SCIENCE —- IT IS IMPOSSIBLE!!!!! 

SO- That is an example of my recently updated common sense!

     —–JUST