IS THIS THE BEST WE CAN DO?
Definitions LIKE :::
“Reliability does not imply validity. That is, a reliable measure that is measuring something consistently is not necessarily measuring what you want to be measuring. For example, while there are many reliable tests of specific abilities, not all of them would be valid for predicting, say, job performance. In terms of accuracy and precision, reliability is a useful way of describing precision, while validity is used to describe accuracy”
^**^ WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS? Lol
This is not the language Anyone beyond a single digit iQ should allow to be applied to them, or hold anyone to the validity considering the verbal vomit of interpretation variance it has.
You don’t believe me?
-/// look it up yourself.
MY RANT (WITHOUT EDIT)
THERE ARE A FEW CONFLICTING, CONSTRUCTIONAL, CONCERNS THAT CREATED AND CAUSED THE EXTINCTION OF CONSISTENCY CONCURRENTLY CAUSING CRAZINESS BY THE CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION BY ANY CONSCIOUS CITIZEN CERTAINLY TO CONTROL AND COMPEL COMPLETE CONFORMITY WITHOUT ANY COMPLAINTS OR CONTEMPT BY THE USE OF THIS CORROSION AND CONTINUATION OF
CONFIGURATIONAL CONTRADICTING CONTAMINANTS OF CONCEPTUAL COMPLIANCE