EVER FEEL LIKE ASKING SOMEONE WHY

HAVE YOU EVER WANTED TO ASK SOMEONE WHY THEY ARE DOING WHAT THEY ARE DOING, THAN REALIZE THERE IS NO REASON TO ASK BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY HAVE NO IDEA? LOL

Writing Something Stupid

If you ever find yourself writing something you think is stupid, don’t worry. Chances are it sounds stupid because nobody else was writing about it before. On the off chance it is stupid, at least you were able to say something about it. I’d rather say something stupid, than withhold something that I think is stupid and might not be.

LAWS ARE PRECISE IN BEING INCONCLUSIVE LOL (RANT)

It’s about time I rant about this topic. Well, first off, how could I not pick on this topic when it is way to easy.  I’ll have to try and focus on one specific area at a time (something that laws have difficulty doing)!

What a field day I can have on this topic. **I’M NOT A LAW STUDENT, LAWYER, OR HAVE ANY OTHER TYPE OF LEGAL BACKROUND** SO DON’T PANIC! I WIL NOT BE USING THIER LEGAL LANGUAGE! WE, STILL HAVE DIFFICULTIES WITH THE WORDS WE USE ON THE DAY THE DAY LOL                                                                                                                          LAUGH NOW BEFORE THIS GOES IN LEGAL LITERACY 101- CHAPTER 1 IS TITLED “THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING” (THEY EVEN INCLUDE PIG LATIN- I MEAN LATIN) JUST TO THROW YOU OFF LOL WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH THAT?

DOES THE LATIN LANUAGE REMAIN DUE TO LAZINESS, OR FROM BEING PREOCCUPIED  (REVISING, CREATING,  AMENDING ALL THE OTHER LAWS)? OR, IS IT THERE JUST TO PISS PEOPLE OFF? MAYBE, ITS PART OF AN OVERALL DESIGN WHICH MAKES PEOPLE FEEL THE NEED TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, AND ENTER INTO PROCEEDINGS, TRIALS, MOTIONS, APPEALS, PLEADINGS, JUSTICE, AND BE AWARDED COMPENSATION FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING IN WHICH YOU NEED TO SHARE WITH YOUR ATTORNEY, LOL

EVEN IF LATIN WAS NOT INVOLVED THEY USE A LANGUAGE THAT CONSISTS OF WORDS WE GENERALLY WOULD NEVER USE. EVER! 

THEY HAD A GOOD RUN UNTIL THE INTERNET POPPED UP. IT IS NOW POSSIBLE FOR THE CLIENT TO RESEARCH INFORMATION WITHOUT REQUIRING THAT MUCH EFFORT.

THERE WAS WIDESPREAD LEGAL PANIC LASTING AT LEAST 2 OR 3 MINUTES UNTIL THEIR EDUCATED MIND SAID “THESE ARE PEOPLE, YOU COULD POST THE INFORMATION ON THEIR FRONT LAWN AND THEY WOULDN’T GIVE IT ANY ATTENTION, SO STOP PANICKING” !    LOL

We might as well start with general understandings and interpretation of law. Already, without going forward I can start ranting on my opening statement.  Interpretation and understanding of laws is so comedic and irrational that they have a “built in safety clause” This is to apply when I Law is considered to be vague, and not clearly understandable by any “reasonable person” lol

I can’t help but laugh as I’m writing this. How could you reasonably identify a reasonable person, from someone who is not reasonable? Especially when a reasonable (sensible) person would possibly have a more difficult time understanding the laws because already presented with conflict that an unreasonable person is one who would break the law by action made through a mind without reasoning capabilities. That would mean that an unreasonable person could not violated a law but not have understood the law, which would make them free from guilt..

A person who is reasonable that will challenge a law or possibly break a law with a logical and valid REASON will be guilty because they knowingly defied the law of record.

There is a lot more to this, you didn’t expect it to be simple, did you? Just writing what I just wrote I’m suffering a mental meltdown. I’ll stop here for now. Think the new defense will be not the glove doesn’t fit, it will be I don’t get it. Oh one last thing consider. There are a few laws that referred to the public morals. Naturally people have different morals, which would cause question to what would violate A person morals considering everybody has different ones. Just you know the law says that the public morals is decided by the government of what they consider to be moral and apply that to the public. Ha ha we won’t even get into that, but if you didn’t know what was considered to be the public morals, then you could legally violated because you didn’t know lol

I’m going to make this post without reviewing it. My brain hurts enough just from writing it. I’ll review it some other time

REAL ESTATE TAXES—-

OUR REAL ESTATE TAXES- 

     This real estate tax thing is just another random thought that I might as well share….

     There are approximately 18k houses in my town with an average real estate tax of $10k per year. That is $180million per year!

     As far as I know the majority of this goes to the schools,(50%) I think….  and the rest is for maintenance of roads, parks, local government and police payroll, and whatever else……..

     So if we take out 1/2 for schools $90million *don’t forget the schools also receive funding from other sources on top of that,yet (We still underpay our teachers) but thats another topic….

     Now there is $90million left for them to spread around…… I’ll have to come back to this because I dont feel like crunching #’s right now. lol I’m sure it won’t add up without “left overs” that they find someway to use use it  ——– responsibly lol

FINGERS CROSSED CONFUSION

CROSSING YOUR FINGERS 

     Some people cross their fingers for good luck, and also cross their fingers to negate a lie. This was something that naturally caught my attention!

     A superstitious gesture used to promote good luck, is also used to protect/defend statements and actions of deceit***

***A person can cross their fingers for “GOOD LUCK” or use it to protect them while telling a lie!!….

They believe that lying with their “fingers crossed” protects them from the responsibility or liability to that lie.

HOW CAN A GESTURE BE USED IN BOTH A POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE WAY BY THE SAME PERSON?

SAME PERSON IS WHAT MAKES IT PROBLEMATIC. It is easy understandable that gestures have different meaning through different cultures religions and whatever. But, for this superstitious gesture to have “selective” meaning used by the same person is very interesting lol

GET IT?????

Another Rant On Language

OH HERE WE GO

     Hopefully it is clear by now, my complete and absolute hatred of the language and words! This is not a result from being  uneducated(I think the colleges should reimburse us) but thats another topic!…..  Even my poor writing skills (openly admit and am aware of) can not be fully or mostly responsible for this…..

.HOW COULD ANYONE REALISTICALLY COMPREHEND THIS LANGUAGE? Is it only me and my limited literary skills that I find it completely ridiculous and aggravating that the meaning of words are (inconclusive) through definitions? Almost every word is defined by multiple words, each of the defining words have a somewhat different directional meaning themselves. It’s difficult enough for someone like me (with little or no writing skills) beyond psychology papers…. But, those were mostly constructed through precise and specific words created by the field of study and only need to use some “regular”  language  or words to connect/fill in. Also, we didn’t lose that many points at all for writing skills, grammar —– they only were interested in the content material and information.

You could almost say something like —— It is by the no way thank of thought to assume presumable no doubts  that prefrontal cortex function is directly involved in processing —  lol  YES MY UNDERLINE PORTION WAS MAYBE A LITTLE EXTREME OF EXAMPLE ( BUT AS LONG AS WHAT IS BOLD, AND THE ACTUAL INFORMATION IS OK, THAN SADLY THEY WOULDN’T CARE OR PENALIZE YOUR GRADE ENOUGH TO MAKE IT SEEM NECESSARY TO LEARN HOW TO WRITE PROPERLY)

Let me choose some words for example (not going to get into grammar , structure) Just a few words or statements

I’m going to try my best to “act naturally” (how can you be natural if your acting?)

Let me be clear that I’ll always try to provide “original copies” (copies- original? need i say more)

It is starting to get “pretty  ugly”

Simple——- is defined “understood, no difficulty” also defined as “abnormally low intelligence” So, something simple is understood without difficulty but, a simple mind might not be able to…..

Understood?  Just as long as you realize the definition of “understood” doesn’t mean “you get it” you may understand something, as long as you are aware that if you understand you don’t “know”—- because the definition of understanding something refers to you only perceiving — blah blah OK I’m done for now, before I get sick….. lol

Perception differences by photography display (This is not a great example) but you’ll see

REAL QUICK

I JUST WANTED TO SHOW AN EXAMPLE OF HOW OUR PERCEPTION CAN BE “INFLUENCED” THROUGH WHAT WE SEE, OR WHAT IS SHOWN…. OH….. ALSO WHAT MAY NOT BE SHOWN

THIS  IS THE FULL PICTURE I’M GOING TO USE FOR THIS EXAMPLE—LOOKS CLEARLY LIKE THE WOMEN IS BENING ARRESTED

perception(original)

NOW IF I JUST CROP HER—– IT IS A COMPLETE DIFFERENT PERCEPTION, NO? ALMOST A PASSIONATE LOOK UP INTO THE SKY SEEING -WHATEVER

Perception1

NEXT CROP- SAME LOOK FROM HER- BUT THE OFFICER IN THE BACKGROUND HAS A LOOK OF SHOCK, AND EVEN WHEN I INCLUDE THE OFFICER THATS MAKING THE ARREST (CROP OUT THE LOWER HALF) THIS STORY LOOKS LIKE OR COULD BE PERCEIVED AS —– SOMETHING DRAMATIC HAS HAPPENED, AND THE WOMEN IS GAZING UP, THE OFFICER BEHIND IS JUST IN SHOCK, AND THE ARRESTING OFFIER MIGHT BE CONSOLING HER….

LOL

perception2 perception3

photo came fromhttp://radio.foxnews.com/2011/10/02/occupying-the-brooklyn-bridge-700-nyc-occupy-wall-st-protesters-arrested/

UPDATE ON “START READING ALL POLICY AND AGREEMENTS”

NEW UPDATE ON “YOUR INFO”

REMINDER I NO LONGER USE ANY SOCIAL MEDIA (JUST THIS)

I’VE PREVIOUSLY POSTED A CONCERN REGARDING READING “TERMS” THAT WAS IN REFERENCE TO A CERTAIN SOCIAL MEDIA GROUP—-

THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO ANOTHER ONE—-

WITHOUT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFYING WHATEVER ——- GENERALLY (HAHA)  ANYTHING YOU TWISTER OR TWINE (HINT)LOL WILL BE RECORDED, DOCUMENTED, AND ARCHIVED IN THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ! THIS IS NO SECRET—– YOU CAN EASILY SEARCH AND HAVE IT DISCLOSED TO YOU

COMEDIANS TRYING TO BE FUNNY!

PERSONAL PREFERENCE ASIDE……

IS IT ONLY ME THAT HEARS “COMEDIANS” THAT ARE “TRYING” TO BE FUNNY, AND ARE COMPLETELY IRRITATING? OPPOSED TO THE COMEDIANS THAT SEEM “CONNECTED” OR PASSIONATE TO THE MATERIAL, AS IF THEY ARE ALMOST NOT TRYING TO BE FUNNY, JUST VENTING WHICH HAPPENS TO BE FUNNY?

UGH…… MORE ON THIS WHEN I FIGURE OUT WHAT I’M SAYING…

WHAT WITH ALL THE IMMUNIZATIONS ?

What is the deal with all of the immunizations and inoculations they are injecting these kids with? Aside from my concerns to the “possible” link to autism! (I’ll leave that topic alone for now)

But, seriously! Whats with all these shots that are being given to kids these days? Kids do not even get to experience the chicken pox anymore!

We have a very efficient and evolved immune system that is being cheated out of valuable practice! How is it going to be prepared to fight of infections if it hasn’t been training and building up immunities naturally?

THAN THERE IS ALSO MY CONCERN OR DISCOMFORT IN ANYTHING THEY WANT TO INJECT INTO YOU WITHOUT US “KNOWING” ALL OF THE CONTENTS IN THESE SHOTS…..