“IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE SOLUTION TO YOUR PROBLEMS, YOU NEED TO CHANGE YOUR PROBLEMS”
“I UNDERSTAND WHY LADY JUSTICE IS WEARING A BLINDFOLD…. SHE DOESN’T WANT TO WITNESS THIS LEGAL MADNESS.”
“JUSTICE IS BLIND I’M ASSUMING IS A RESULT OF READING THE LAW AND WANTING TO STAB YOUR EYES OUT”
Understanding the law and trying to explain it is difficult enough without the LATIN terminology still being used. WHY?
In general, why would you add/include any other language to the laws that apply when it is difficult enough to explain them already?
HERE IS ONE EXAMPLE OF DEFINITIONS TO SHOW HOW CRAZY THE LANGUAGE IS-
1. a real or imaginary wrong causing resentment and regarded as grounds for complaint
2. a feeling of resentment or injustice at having been unfairly treated
3. affliction or hardship
HOW CAN IT BE REAL AND IMAGINARY ?
“MANY PEOPLE ASK WHAT IS THIER PURPOSE IN LIFE?. DO THEY EVER ASK THEMSELVES WHAT SOMEONE ELSES PURPOSE IN LIFE IS?” LOL
“YOUR RIGHTS COME WITH RESPONSIBILITIES. GET TO KNOW YOUR RIGHTS, DEFEND THEM, ENFORCE THEM, AND APPLY THEM WHEN THEY ARE CHALLENGED. MORE IMPORTANTLY IS TO CONSIDER THAT MOST RIGHTS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED THROUGH GREAT SACRIFICE AND COST BY OTHERS. SO IF YOU WISH TO BE PROTECTED UNDER THESE RIGHTS, YOU ARE ALSO OBLIGATED TO DEFEND THOSE RIGHTS AS WELL.”
“IF YOU’RE NOT LIVING YOUR DREAM, YOU NEED TO WAKE UP AND LIVE IT”
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
“Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.”
“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds” Samuel Adams
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”
THIS IS NOT REFERRING TO ANY SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTER
Attorneys have devoted a significant amount of time and money to obtain their law degree. Usually a Doctor of Jurisprudence or Juris Doctor. Whatever the degree/title or “State BAR” requirements are to “practice” law are, I have a question. ———-
WHEN A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE REJECTS THE LAW BECAUSE IT CHALLENGES THE “NORMAL SYSTEM OF CONSISTENT CONFORMITY”, IS THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM GUILTY AS WELL AS THE INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY?
This is a complicated subject, but is one that is important. There is no doubt in my mind that there are great attorneys out there, and regardless of great resistance and being ostracized they still challenge certain issues that majority would/could not. The numbers show that it is “SYSTEMATIC” NOT TO GO TO COURT!!!!!
IF YOU ARE GUILTY, A PLEA IS A GOOD DEAL!…… IF YOU ARE INNOCENT, THE “SYSTEM” MAKES IT PUNISHABLE TO PROVE IT IN COURT.
WELL THIS IS INTERESTING
In the fiscal year of 2010-2011 (July 2010 to June 2011), the trial courts (circuit and county) in Florida disposed of 2,774,302 civil cases (not including probate, family court, or civil traffic infraction cases). Of that, only 1,049 were disposed by a jury and only 4,348 were disposed through a non-jury or bench trial. So out of all the cases disposed during the 2010-2011 fiscal year, less than 0.2% made it to trial. As for settling prior to trial, just looking at Circuit Civil alone (not including probate, family court, or civil traffic infraction cases), 9.9% of cases settle prior to other disposition and 1.2% settle through mediation. So nearly 90% of all civil cases in the state circuit courts (not including probate, family court, or civil traffic infraction cases) fail to settle or make it to trial.
I’m not a attorney, I have no “formal” legal education. That being said, I find it unacceptable if I speak with an attorney or other legal official that do not know the legal statute/code/law/amendment/terminology….. ect…. BUT STILL CLAIM TO KNOW IT AND/OR APPLY IT WRONGFULLY -THEY SHOULD JUST ADMIT WHEN THEY NEED TO RESEARCH IT OR DOUBLE CHECK IT——–
THERE IS SO MUCH COMPLEXITY BEYOND THE JUST THE “BASIC” THAT I WOULD UNDERSTAND THEM NEEDING TO CHECK!!!!!!!
IT DOESN’T MAKE THEM INCOMPETENT WHEN THEY ARE NOT SURE ABOUT SOMETHING, BUT, NEGLIGENT IF THEY PROCEED REGARDLESS
LIKE MEDICAL DOCTORS
WE TRUST THESE PROFESSIONALS WITH OUR LIFE!!!!!
ASK QUESTIONS, GET 2ND OPINIONS
The reason I’m calling it OFF LAND and not OFF SHORE is to differentiate between a “floating vessel” in the bay, from a true OFF SHORE fishing boat that ventures out into the ocean “OFF SHORE”. There is a significant difference of the two, and just as many of other differences. Yes, I am talking about anything that floats from a kayak to a boat.
Since there is no shortage of things needed to be mentioned with boats alone, I will leave the kayaks and everything in between alone for now. After I talk about these “issues” with boats, that have more than an annoyance. It’s amazing that anyone venturing out on the water without being in a boat of decent size, would even risk it. Stupidity on the water is something that I couldn’t possibly describe fully. It’s something that I can only partially describe, and others need to understand that nothing is being exaggerated. However you interpret and vision it, make sure you understand it is at least 10x worse.
First I must mention that anything offshore, must be in the ocean. Those in the bay or close to land are not considered offshore. ^^THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT OFF SHORE FISHERMAN^^ They are usually weekend warriors, obstructing and recklessly pretending to be boaters. They don’t even realize that the buoys indicate or mean something…… As much as I enjoy seeing these morons get stuck bottoming out in shallow water, this limited and selective entertainment. The reason why, is fortunately for them, they usually have been regularly zipping along clueless to the channels marked, and depth of the water. Usually only get stuck at low tide, then wonder why because they have gone that way plenty of times before, and never got stuck….
Alright, now I’m going to try and get through talking about the bay boating topic as quickly as possible, just like I do when I head out on my boat, I try and get to the ocean as quick as possible away from these bay boat weekend warriors.
1- The south shore of Long Island (bays) have very very narrow channels that if you vere slightly off/outside these channels, Your going to bottom out! It appears to be a large and navigable body of water, IT’S NOT! Most of the bay you could just walk around in. So, when you have these idiots who anchor in the middle of a narrow channel (thats marked) You wish you had a steel hull and big enough vessel to just plow right over them!
2- Still referring to the narrow channels. Naturally, your going to have moments when your heading one way, and another boat is coming your way. *I would have said that it is expected to experiences oncoming traffic on an opposite side, Only it’s not that simple. It should be, considering most of these people operate a car, and should naturally pick one side of the “lane” channel. Maybe, even stay on the right side of the channel like you would on a road…. haha sure! Even if you do not know the buoy system, in these areas I’m referring to it clearly marks a green buoy on one side and a red directly on the other (visually, laying out a very clear path. Even if the buoys were rainbow, it would still should be obvious that they are indicating a path!
XXX BUOY))) vv ^^ (((BUOY XXX
– vBOATv ^BOAT^
You see what I’m talking about? Looking at the screen you can see there is a buoy on the right and one on the left. (You need to stay in-between them or your must likely going to bottom out. That’s also why they have these “channel markers”! Now, again even without nautical technicalities of reference, I think even a 10yr old looking at this could figure this out. The boat going (up) lol is on the right side, oh and guess what? The boat heading (down)lol is staying to his right side also (just like we do on the road) lol I’ll try and give a visual somehow.
Below is an example — light blue=channel (less than a 100ft wide)!
The darker blue (outside the channel) as you see is 1ft deep!
It is important to bring into perspective how wide 100ft is….. Lets say the boats have a10ft beam (width). That will mean that any two boats passing each other in this channel will require at least 25-30ft
TO BE CONTINUED