TRUST (QUOTE)

“BEFORE YOU CAN TRUST SOMEONE ELSE, MAKE SURE YOU CAN TRUST YOURSELF IN MAKING THAT DECISION”

STEPHEN JAMES

Writing Something Stupid

If you ever find yourself writing something you think is stupid, don’t worry. Chances are it sounds stupid because nobody else was writing about it before. On the off chance it is stupid, at least you were able to say something about it. I’d rather say something stupid, than withhold something that I think is stupid and might not be.

HEADING OUT TO SEA, OR, BACK IN (PICTURE REFERENCE)

THESE ARE PICTURES THAT I HAVE TAKEN, AND MIGHT OFFER A VISUAL EXPLANATION TO THINGS I HAVE WRITTEN!

WHEN I WRITE ABOUT THE FREEDOM, ESCAPE, OR BREAK FROM LIFE, THAT HEADING OUT ON THE OCEAN OFFERS ME. THIS IS A PICTURE REFERS TO THAT.  

150745_10150932489021084_422112175_n

SOMETIMES I WRITE ABOUT RETURNING BACK TO LAND (REALITY) AND THE STORM AT HOME. IT WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS. 

208973_10151027459741084_511304915_n

THIS IS JUST ONE REFERENCE OF MANY! I JUST THINK THESE PICTURES I TOOK EXPLAIN THOSE TWO EXAMPLES BETTER THAN WORDS COULD!

HERE IS ANOTHER ONE—- THIS ONE SHOWS WHAT IT’S LIKE WHEN HEADING OUT AND AWAY TAKING A PEEK BACK 

406318_10151085430821084_816985974_n

LAWS ARE PRECISE IN BEING INCONCLUSIVE LOL (RANT)

It’s about time I rant about this topic. Well, first off, how could I not pick on this topic when it is way to easy.  I’ll have to try and focus on one specific area at a time (something that laws have difficulty doing)!

What a field day I can have on this topic. **I’M NOT A LAW STUDENT, LAWYER, OR HAVE ANY OTHER TYPE OF LEGAL BACKROUND** SO DON’T PANIC! I WIL NOT BE USING THIER LEGAL LANGUAGE! WE, STILL HAVE DIFFICULTIES WITH THE WORDS WE USE ON THE DAY THE DAY LOL                                                                                                                          LAUGH NOW BEFORE THIS GOES IN LEGAL LITERACY 101- CHAPTER 1 IS TITLED “THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING” (THEY EVEN INCLUDE PIG LATIN- I MEAN LATIN) JUST TO THROW YOU OFF LOL WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH THAT?

DOES THE LATIN LANUAGE REMAIN DUE TO LAZINESS, OR FROM BEING PREOCCUPIED  (REVISING, CREATING,  AMENDING ALL THE OTHER LAWS)? OR, IS IT THERE JUST TO PISS PEOPLE OFF? MAYBE, ITS PART OF AN OVERALL DESIGN WHICH MAKES PEOPLE FEEL THE NEED TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, AND ENTER INTO PROCEEDINGS, TRIALS, MOTIONS, APPEALS, PLEADINGS, JUSTICE, AND BE AWARDED COMPENSATION FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING IN WHICH YOU NEED TO SHARE WITH YOUR ATTORNEY, LOL

EVEN IF LATIN WAS NOT INVOLVED THEY USE A LANGUAGE THAT CONSISTS OF WORDS WE GENERALLY WOULD NEVER USE. EVER! 

THEY HAD A GOOD RUN UNTIL THE INTERNET POPPED UP. IT IS NOW POSSIBLE FOR THE CLIENT TO RESEARCH INFORMATION WITHOUT REQUIRING THAT MUCH EFFORT.

THERE WAS WIDESPREAD LEGAL PANIC LASTING AT LEAST 2 OR 3 MINUTES UNTIL THEIR EDUCATED MIND SAID “THESE ARE PEOPLE, YOU COULD POST THE INFORMATION ON THEIR FRONT LAWN AND THEY WOULDN’T GIVE IT ANY ATTENTION, SO STOP PANICKING” !    LOL

We might as well start with general understandings and interpretation of law. Already, without going forward I can start ranting on my opening statement.  Interpretation and understanding of laws is so comedic and irrational that they have a “built in safety clause” This is to apply when I Law is considered to be vague, and not clearly understandable by any “reasonable person” lol

I can’t help but laugh as I’m writing this. How could you reasonably identify a reasonable person, from someone who is not reasonable? Especially when a reasonable (sensible) person would possibly have a more difficult time understanding the laws because already presented with conflict that an unreasonable person is one who would break the law by action made through a mind without reasoning capabilities. That would mean that an unreasonable person could not violated a law but not have understood the law, which would make them free from guilt..

A person who is reasonable that will challenge a law or possibly break a law with a logical and valid REASON will be guilty because they knowingly defied the law of record.

There is a lot more to this, you didn’t expect it to be simple, did you? Just writing what I just wrote I’m suffering a mental meltdown. I’ll stop here for now. Think the new defense will be not the glove doesn’t fit, it will be I don’t get it. Oh one last thing consider. There are a few laws that referred to the public morals. Naturally people have different morals, which would cause question to what would violate A person morals considering everybody has different ones. Just you know the law says that the public morals is decided by the government of what they consider to be moral and apply that to the public. Ha ha we won’t even get into that, but if you didn’t know what was considered to be the public morals, then you could legally violated because you didn’t know lol

I’m going to make this post without reviewing it. My brain hurts enough just from writing it. I’ll review it some other time

BELIEF (QUOTE)

“ANYTHING ACCEPTED IS NOT A BELIEF, AND A BELIEF IS NOT SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED”

STEPHEN JAMES

REAL ESTATE TAXES—-

OUR REAL ESTATE TAXES- 

     This real estate tax thing is just another random thought that I might as well share….

     There are approximately 18k houses in my town with an average real estate tax of $10k per year. That is $180million per year!

     As far as I know the majority of this goes to the schools,(50%) I think….  and the rest is for maintenance of roads, parks, local government and police payroll, and whatever else……..

     So if we take out 1/2 for schools $90million *don’t forget the schools also receive funding from other sources on top of that,yet (We still underpay our teachers) but thats another topic….

     Now there is $90million left for them to spread around…… I’ll have to come back to this because I dont feel like crunching #’s right now. lol I’m sure it won’t add up without “left overs” that they find someway to use use it  ——– responsibly lol

COMMON SENSE AWARENESS

DO YOU KNOW WHAT COMMON SENSE IS? OR, MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT IT IS NOT!

     Are you aware that common sense is not a valid reference or even a reliable source to support to itself? This will definitely be confusing and difficult to comprehend even if I was able to describe it well.

     Maybe it is a good thing that this described in a way without proper writing techniques….. Something like this is hard enough to understand to begin with, without me making it worse by trying to write properly.

     So I’m just gonna write it how I think it. Your common sense is only what you have commonly accepted to be accurate, and excepted as true in the past. In no way is that permanent, or expected to be a permanent. It is only temporary beliefs formed by past experiences that have supported it. When new information is presented that may challenge these “common sense” beliefs, they should always be considered as a possible replacement for the old common sense!

     FOR EXAMPLE- THIS WAS SOMETHING I HAVE JUST RECENTLY EXPERIENCED…….

          —-MY ENTIRE LIFE I WAS UNDER THE BELIEF THAT COAL COULD BE TURNED INTO A DIAMOND UNDER PRESSURE AND TIME ——- IT WAS COMMON SENSE TO ME THAT COAL COULD BE TRANSFORMED INTO A DIAMOND!!!!! THERE WERE JOKES REFERENCING THIS (STICK COAL UP HIS *** AND IT WILL TURN INTO A DIAMOND!)

     I’M PRETTY SURE THAT EVEN SUPERMAN HAD SOME CONTRIBUTION TO THIS “COAL INTO DIAMOND”

     WELL, MY COMMON SENSE THAT COAL CAN PRODUCE A DIAMOND HAS JUST RECENTLY BECAME AWARE TO ME AS 100% FALSE!!!! IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR COAL TO PRODUCE A DIAMOND! EVER! —- WITHOUT GOING INTO MOLECULAR SCIENCE —- IT IS IMPOSSIBLE!!!!! 

SO- That is an example of my recently updated common sense!

     —–JUST

FINGERS CROSSED CONFUSION

CROSSING YOUR FINGERS 

     Some people cross their fingers for good luck, and also cross their fingers to negate a lie. This was something that naturally caught my attention!

     A superstitious gesture used to promote good luck, is also used to protect/defend statements and actions of deceit***

***A person can cross their fingers for “GOOD LUCK” or use it to protect them while telling a lie!!….

They believe that lying with their “fingers crossed” protects them from the responsibility or liability to that lie.

HOW CAN A GESTURE BE USED IN BOTH A POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE WAY BY THE SAME PERSON?

SAME PERSON IS WHAT MAKES IT PROBLEMATIC. It is easy understandable that gestures have different meaning through different cultures religions and whatever. But, for this superstitious gesture to have “selective” meaning used by the same person is very interesting lol

GET IT?????

THIS IS THE OCEAN SPEAKING (POEM)

THIS IS THE OCEAN SPEAKING  

IT IS ME, THE OCEAN SPEAKING TO YOU

LISTEN CLEARLY TO THIS OFFERED VIEW

AS I SHOW MY EBB AND FLOW

I’LL PROVIDE YOU WITH EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

IF YOU CAN LEARN TO MOVE IN SYNC WITH MY WAVES

THAN YOU CAN APPLY IT TO YOUR LIFE IN MANY WAYS

THERE WILL BE TIMES THAT I’M GOING TO BE ROUGH

THIS WILL PREPARE YOU FOR WHEN YOUR LIFE GETS TOUGH

DO NOT CHALLENGE ME WHEN I’M SHOWING AN OBVIOUS DANGER

SOMETHING LIFE MIGHT HIDE BEHIND A STRANGER

BOTH GOOD AND BAD WILL BE SHOWN ON THE SURFACE

OTHERWISE WHAT WOULD BE THE PURPOSE

ALL THESE THOUGHTS WEIGHING YOU DOWN

OUT HERE WOULD CAUSE YOU TO DROWN

WHEN THINGS IN LIFE SEEM UNCLEAR

COME TO ME FOR YOUR REFLECTION TO APPEAR

AS YOU LOOK AT THE REFLECTION I PROVIDE

DON’T FORGET BELOW THAT MANY OTHERS RESIDE

IT IS TIME FOR ME TO HEAD OUT

THIS SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO THINK ABOUT

THERE IS NO NEED FOR CONCERN

OF COURSE I AM GOING TO RETURN

REMEMBER I AM AT THE MERCY OF OTHER FORCES

I THINK ARE FAIR IN DISTRIBUTING MY RESOURCES

AS I TEMPORARILY RETREAT

DO NOT THINK THIS CONVERSATION IS COMPLETE

STEPHEN JAMES

READING SOMETHING YOU DISLIKE (QUOTE)

“IF YOU READ SOMETHING YOU DON’T LIKE. REMEMBER THERE ARE OPTIONS. YOU CAN READ IT AGAIN AND CHANGE THE WAY YOU INTERPRET IT, OR YOU CAN DISREGARD WHAT YOU READ AND NOT BOTHER READING IT AGAIN.”

STEPHEN JAMES